Committee Advances Medical Device Tax Repeal

The Republican-run Ways and Means Committee in the House voted Tuesday to repeal a 2.3 percent tax on many medical devices that helps pay for the health care overhaul, the Associated Press reported.
The committee's mostly party-line vote passed 25 to 14, with one Democrat, Rep. Ron Kind, D-Wis., voting for it. Committee chairman Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., wrote an amendment that would put the repeal into effect beginning the quarter after its passage into law.
The vote came with Republicans complaining that the medical device tax costs jobs and stifles innovation.
“It's like putting sandbags on the wings of the Wright Brothers as they try to figure out how to fly an airplane,” Rep. Patrick Meehan, R-Pa., is quoted as saying.
Democrats say those claims are exaggerations and complained that Republicans have offered no savings to cover the $20 to $30 billion in revenue over the next decade that would be lost.
The bill was “the obvious effort of Republicans to essentially piece by piece, if they can't do it entirely, to repeal” Obama's health law, said Rep. Sander Levin, D-Mich.
The GOP-led House has voted three times to repeal the medical device tax since it was enacted in 2010 and the Senate approved a repeal in 2013, though on a non-binding vote. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, introduced a repeal bill in his chamber that garnered some Democratic support, but no vote has been scheduled.
The tax, which took effect in 2013, does not apply to consumer items like eyeglasses and pregnancy test kits.
The Ways and Means committee approved a separate bill repealing another part of the health law: an independent panel that is supposed to propose ways to reduce Medicare spending. Seven Democrats joined Republicans in pushing that measure through the panel.
Supporters of that bill say the Independent Payment Advisory Board has too much power, since its suggested savings would take effect unless Congress blocks them.
None of the board's 15 members has been appointed yet. The panel could only issue proposals if the growth in medical costs reaches levels that, thanks to a slowdown in health care inflation, are not expected anytime soon.
By law, the board's suggestions cannot ration care or propose increased premiums or other costs for beneficiaries, meaning its proposals would be largely limited to reimbursements to many providers.
Repealing the board would cost an estimated $7 billion over 10 years, according to the Associated Press, which notes that  Republicans have not proposed any savings to pay for the bill.

(Story from the Times Union)