Hoosier voters are unhappy with President Donald Trump and don’t think the state is heading in the right direction, according to a Free Press Indiana Poll conducted by Bellwether Research.

Out of more than 800 likely voters who were surveyed, 54% said they disapprove of the way Trump is handling his job as president, while 44% said they approve. Of those numbers, 48% said they strongly disapprove of Trump, and 28% said they strongly approve.

Trump’s high disapproval rating marks a sharp turn for voters in deep-red Indiana, where the president won the state by nearly 20 percentage points in the 2024 election against Democrat Kamala Harris.

Now, skyrocketing gas prices fueled by the war in Iran and growing inflation have disgruntled many Hoosiers who voted for Trump and expected him to make Indiana more affordable, argued Chad Kinsella, a political scientist at Ball State University.

“His whole thing was bringing down costs,” he said. “Trump’s numbers are underwater, and people are not happy.”

Still, the poll found Republican support for the president remained steady. Only 15% of those surveyed who identified as Republican said they didn’t approve of him. However, 96% of Democrats said they didn’t approve, and 69% of independents also disapproved of Trump.

Democrats’ universal dislike of the president is likely to spur many to turn out and vote against Republicans in Indiana’s midterms, Kinsella said. According to the survey, 58% of Democrats said they are more enthusiastic to vote this year than normal, while just 34% of Republicans feel the same way.

“Democrats realize that the momentum is on their side and they’re excited,” Kinsella said. “(Republicans) are going to have to pay their pound of flesh in this election unless something changes fairly drastically very soon.”

Nationally, the president’s approval rating sits at a near-historic low of around 32%, according to a Reuters/Ispos poll conducted earlier this month. Other reliably red states like Alaska and Texas have also seen Trump’s approval rating fall. Democratic Senate candidates in those states are leading in the polls.

Hoosiers disapprove of Braun

Trump’s approval rating is also dragging down how Hoosiers view Gov. Mike Braun, according to Kinsella.

The poll found 48% of likely voters disapprove of how the first-term governor is doing his job, while 38% approve and 13% said they weren’t sure. That dovetailed with 47% of Hoosiers saying they think Indiana is heading in the wrong direction and just 35% saying it’s on the right track.

Braun received a Trump endorsement in the 2024 election and easily defeated Democrat Jennifer McCormick. His administration has closely aligned itself with the president’s agenda and often touts its relationship with Trump.

“The president is the brand, and if the president’s brand is not doing well, then the whole thing goes down with him,” Kinsella said. “That includes Braun.”

Of those who identified as Republican, 67% said they approved of the governor. Only 9% of Democrats said they approved and 20% of independents said the same.

Braun’s underwater approval rating comes even as he makes affordability a top issue. The poll found cost of living was one of the top two issues concerning Hoosiers, just below government corruption.

Since April, Braun has suspended the state’s gas tax, making Indiana’s fuel prices the lowest in the nation. He’s also put pressure on the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission to find ways to bring down electricity bills for residents.

Kinsella said he expected Braun’s focus on affordability to bolster his approval rating. But in an environment in which national politics often overshadows state issues, most Hoosiers will tether Braun’s performance to Trump, Kinsella said.

“The president is the brand, and the president is not popular,” he said.

* * *

Free Press Indiana commissioned the poll by Bellwether Research. It surveyed 896 registered voters in Indiana from October 8-11 via telephone interviews and online surveys sent by text message. The results are based on responses from 839 likely voters, and the margin of error is plus or minus 3.4 percentage points. Bellwether Research’s clients include former Gov. Mitch Daniels, Eli Lilly and the Nature Conservancy in Indiana.

FPI News, a nonprofit newsroom, is funded through grants and donations from individuals, foundations and organizations. Sign up for our free newsletter.

To see the original story, click here.

FPI News reporter Carson Gerber covers healthcare, manufacturing, agriculture, immigration … and just about any other topic that’s shaping how we live in Indiana today. Reach him at 765-204-4250‬ or carson.gerber@fpinews.org.

The post New poll shows President Trump’s approval ratings falter in Indiana appeared first on News Now Warsaw.

WARSAW — A town hall meeting in Warsaw that will focus on statewide property tax reform has been expanded to include State Sen. Chris Garten who is now expected to become the state senate leader.

State Sen. Ryan Mishler and Rep. Craig Snow of Warsaw were already scheduled to participate in the late-September event, but will now be joined by Garton, who was praised on Wednesday by both Indiana Gov. Mike Braun and President Donald Trump.

Garton is now expected to replace Rod Bray, a target of President Trump, who recently announced plans to step down from his GOP leadership position.

Bray did not support Trump's failed redistricting efforts in Indiana, which was intended to ensure all nine of Indiana's Congressional district could be controlled by Republicans.

Bray is one of about six Republican senators that Trump retaliated against for failure to support redistricting. Many of those lost in primary re-election bids in May.

Trump used social media on Wednesday to congratulate Garton while continuing to bash Bray over the Senate's defeat in December of congressional redistricting.

“This finishes off my work against political leaders in the state Senate who let our country down," Trump said in a story reported by Indiana Capital Chronicle. “If they did what they should have done, and what every other State did, as requested, we would have had two more seats in the House of Representatives!”

The upcoming town hall meeting on property taxes is set for Sept.  29 at the Zimmer Biomet Center Lake Pavilion in Warsaw.

Mishler is the chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee and Snow has become a leading voice on the House Ways and Means Committee.

They're expected to highlight details on possible changes sought by Mishler in the state's reliance on the homestead tax.

That plan will likely be one of several property tax proposals including one that seeks to replace property taxes with a switch to a sales tax on certain services that will be filed ahead of the upcoming General Assembly in January.

As of Thursday morning, the town hall was not being promoted on the Kosciusko County Republican Facebook page.

The event is organized by Kristi Ormsby who has overseen campaigns for Mishler, Snow and other area Republicans.

To read the latest story about Garten, check out the Indiana Capital Chronicle story here.

The post Three Republican leaders to highlight property tax reform talks in Warsaw appeared first on News Now Warsaw.

By Leslie Bonilla Muniz
Indiana Capital Chronicle

Gov. Mike Braun fired Indiana Utility Regulatory Commissioner Andy Zay from his post on Monday — just six weeks after Zay voted in favor of an AES Indiana rate hike and was demoted from IURC chair.

“Zay was discharged from employment with the State of Indiana today, August 3, 2026, for non-adherence to state policies and laws related to his role as Commissioner at the IURC,” agency spokesman Kirollos Barsoum said in an email to the Capital Chronicle.

More specifically, SPD said Zay was dismissed for “multiple potential violations of state policy; including failing to file a required financial disclosure after his removal as Chair, improperly awarding payments and personal gifts to employees, and directing staff to alter a public meeting agenda without consulting the new Chair.”

When reached by phone, Zay only said, “I cannot comment at this time.”

The firing is the latest shakeup to a typically quiet panel of regulators, and could impact a critical vote to reconsider the AES Indiana increase.

Braun first appointed Zay to the IURC — and named him chair — in December as part of the governor’s affordability push. Zay left a seat in the Indiana Senate in January to start the new gig.

In February, he launched an affordability inquiry, questioning the “big five” investor-owned utilities on their rates in March and holding a listening tour for frustrated ratepayers around the state through April.

But in June, Zay joined Commissioners David Veleta and David Ziegner in a 3-1 vote to approve a $71 million rate electricity rate increase for AES Indiana customers. Commissioner Bob Deig voted in opposition, while a fifth member, Anthony Swinger, recused himself from the case.

The amount was less than the $193 million hike AES Indiana originally sought, and below the $91 million proposed in a settlement agreement.

But Braun and Utility Consumer Counselor Abby Gray — who had recommended a decrease to current rates — denounced the decision. Gray’s office represents ratepayers in IURC cases.

Days later, Braun removed Zay as chair and elevated Swinger, a former member of Gray’s office, to the IURC’s top spot.

“I thought I was fairly clear when I said I want you (commissioners) to make sure you’re changing the dynamic, to where you’re not rubber-stamping what utilities have wanted,” Braun told reporters at the time. “… I made the adjustment there in terms of the chairmanship, because I thought that should have been clear.”

The termination marks a rare step for an Indiana governor. IURC members are appointed to four-year terms and can leave voluntarily at any time — but can only be fired “for cause.”

Gov. Mitch Daniels carried out the most recent firing in 2012, when he dismissed former IURC Chair David Lott Hardy for his role in an ethics scandal, The Indiana Lawyer reported. Hardy was aware that an administrative law judge had been communicating with Duke Energy while presiding over its cases, ultimately getting a high-paying job with the utility.

Membership changes could impact AES hike reconsideration

Zay’s not the only one out as a regulator in more recent months.

Veleta announced he would resign from the IURC in late June. Braun selected a successor, attorney Joby Jerrells, in July after a nominating committee winnowed 25 applicants to three finalists.

“I think he could see that it was maybe going to be going in a little (bit of a) different direction,” Braun said of Veleta.

At the governor’s behest, the Office of Utility Consumer Counselor last month asked IURC members to reconsider their approval of the AES Indiana hike. The filing contends regulators “erred” in granting some of the utility’s requests.

The vote on that petition is scheduled for Wednesday, according to a finalized agenda posted Monday.

Jerrells will replace Veleta — who was one of the “yes” votes in June — and Zay’s spot will be vacant.

That leaves Ziegner as the only commissioner remaining who previously voted in favor of the increase.

The nominating committee, meanwhile, will reconvene to help fill its fifth vacancy in less than a year.

Indiana Democratic Party Chair Karen Tallian said “Braun is using Andy Zay as a scapegoat. Braun knew the AES case was being investigated when he appointed Zay. The buck must stop with the governor’s poor judgment. The only commissioner who voted against any recent major electric increase is former Democratic State Senator Bob Deig. We invite Hoosiers to elect more Democratic legislators this November who will put families before utility profits for a change.”

The post Andy Zay fired from utility regulator panel weeks after being demoted appeared first on News Now Warsaw.

The Chicago Bears gave a boost Friday to the prospects of building the team’s new stadium in northwest Indiana, which top Indiana officials immediately seized as a sign that the multibillion-dollar deal will happen.

The Bears released a statement saying the NFL franchise’s board of directors on Thursday “voted to advance our stadium development project in Hammond, Indiana, with the exact site to be selected.”

“We believe a world-class stadium project in Hammond will transform the region connecting northwest Indiana to the South Side of Chicago through the Loop and across neighborhoods and suburbs stretching north of the city,” the statement said. “It will bring Chicagoland together and deliver new opportunities to its residents and businesses.”

The team did not specifically mention the Wolf Lake site near the state line in Hammond that has been under consideration for months as the possible location — and some Illinois officials said a deal with the Bears was still possible.

A sports economist told the Indiana Capital Chronicle that although Indiana might be “in the lead” for the stadium project, the site decision wasn’t final.

Indiana governor declares victory

The Bears’ announcement comes after Illinois legislators adjourned their spring session early Monday without endorsing any response to Indiana’s stadium offer — approved by lawmakers and signed by Gov. Mike Braun in late February.

Indiana’s package would create a Hammond stadium district and direct more than $1 billion in taxpayer money toward district infrastructure that officials say would also support the team’s plans for surrounding retail, restaurants and residential areas.

Bears officials had said for several months that their stadium options were team-owned property in the northwestern Chicago suburb of Arlington Heights and the Hammond site.

Braun released a statement Friday in which the governor said “Hoosiers, help me welcome the Chicago Bears to our great state!”

“We look forward to building a partnership as strong as the ’85 Bears defense, creating opportunities and economic growth that will benefit our state and the Bears organization for decades to come,” Braun said. “An NFL franchise in Northwest Indiana will be an economic boost to the entire region like we haven’t seen before.”

Expert says, “It ain’t over”

Statements from the Bears and Braun did not mention any signed agreements for the stadium project. The governor’s office did not immediately respond Friday to questions about the status of any contracts.

“It ain’t over till it’s over — and, so, it ain’t over,” said Mark Rosentraub, director of the University of Michigan’s Center for Sports Venues and Real Estate Development.

He regarded the stadium talks as “in the third quarter of this decision.”

Rosentraub said Friday’s statement from the Bears improved the chances of a Hammond stadium, but it will still be a difficult choice for the team to cross the state line.

“I think the Hammond location does offer opportunities for development, that is something that the Bears are interested in pursuing,” Rosentraub told the Capital Chronicle. “Right now, Indiana is in the lead, but you can’t underestimate the value of that emotional pull in Chicago.”

Celebration — and caution — in Indiana

Republican House Speaker Todd Huston, who was the lead sponsor of Indiana’s stadium bill, called the Bears’ statement “a fantastic win for Indiana.”

“I am thrilled the Bears ownership voted to develop a world-class stadium facility in Hammond,” Huston said in a statement. “This will be a transformative project for Northwest Indiana, benefiting our entire state.”

The Indiana enthusiasm was bipartisan, with Democratic state Rep. Earl Harris of East Chicago — a co-sponsor of the state’s incentive package — calling the Bears announcement “a monumental day for Northwest Indiana.”

“The Chicago Bears moving to Hammond, Indiana will not just have a great impact on Northwest Indiana, but the state as a whole,” Harris said. “Thank you to the Chicago Bears leadership for giving The Region this opportunity.”

A cautionary tone, however, came from Republican Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Ryan Mishler.

“This is a great step forward in our efforts to bring the Bears to Indiana, and I am grateful to the Bears leadership team for their communication with us during this discussion period,” Mishler said in a statement. “I look forward to further fostering our relationship with them as we continue discussing our next steps in the process.”

Illinois “remains open” to talks

Some Illinois officials indicated they would keep working to keep the Bears in the state.

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson has been trying to restart a deal for keeping the team in the city. His office said Friday it wasn’t surprised by the Bears’ statement, as the franchise has considered multiple stadium sites in recent years.

“It’s also not surprising that Bears officials have stated this vote does not mean a move to Hammond is a done deal,” the mayor’s office said. “Without a final site selection, until we see shovels in the ground in Hammond, the city will continue to engage in discussions grounded in the interest of our residents.”

Illinois legislators weren’t able to agree on a counteroffer three months after Indiana’s package was approved and are not scheduled to meet again until October.

Illinois House Speaker Emanuel Welch said in a Friday statement that “Illinois remains open to ongoing efforts to secure the Bears in Illinois,” but acknowledged that “it will take time to get it right.”

“While Indiana is willing to raise taxes and promise $1 billion in taxpayer funds, Illinois has focused on the needs of working families who want relief at the gas pump, at the store, and on their insurance bills — not taxpayer-funded stadiums,” Welch said.

The post Chicago Bears say they will ‘advance’ stadium plans for northwest Indiana site appeared first on News Now Warsaw.

The post Next 2 weeks could sway chances of Chicago Bears picking Indiana stadium site appeared first on News Now Warsaw.

Gov. Mike Braun not only extended the suspension of the sales tax on gasoline another 30 days Wednesday — he paused the state gas tax, as well.

The latter is 36 cents per gallon, meaning Hoosier motorists will save 59.3 cents a gallon for the next month.

The 30-day tax suspensions, combined, are expected to cost state coffers $104 million and local units $52 million. Braun’s initial 30-day suspension of the 7% sales tax on gasoline came at a separate $50 million revenue cost.

“Making life more affordable for Hoosiers will always be my top priority,” Braun said Wednesday. “Suspending both the gas tax and excise tax gives Hoosiers meaningful relief for the next month.”

The current 30-day sales tax suspension was set to end May 8.

Braun said the energy emergency will give Hoosiers a 12.4% discount on the average price of gasoline in Indiana.

When Braun took action in April, the average cost for a gallon of gas in Indiana was $4.14, according to AAA. That price has now risen to $4.76.

Braun also announced Wednesday that he will increase the mileage reimbursement rate for state employees who utilize their own vehicles for work-related travel. Details on that increase will be shared once confirmed by the governor’s office.

This story will be updated.

* * *

The Indiana Capital Chronicle is an independent, nonprofit news organization dedicated to giving Hoosiers a comprehensive look inside state government, policy and elections. The site combines daily coverage with in-depth scrutiny, political awareness and insightful commentary.

You can read the original version of the story here.

The post Braun adds Indiana gas tax suspension on top of sales tax break appeared first on News Now Warsaw.

Indiana Gov. Mike Braun has signaled a growing willingness to legalize marijuana, noting the Hoosier State is “surrounded” by states that have legalized the drug to some degree.

Illinois, Michigan and Ohio allow recreational use, while Kentucky has authorized medicinal.

“I’m going to do what makes sense,” Braun told reporters Tuesday. “I’ve said law enforcement will be important. I’ve been talking to them, and now, the amount of traffic that crosses the border, you know, it’s noticeable. So, all of that will be taken into consideration.”

[caption id="attachment_130576" align="alignright" width="204"] Mike Braun[/caption]

President Donald Trump’s administration this week rescheduled medical marijuana — subject to a state license — to a less restrictive category, but kept recreational use in the list of drugs with the highest potential for abuse. But the administration has also kicked off an expedited administrative hearing process to consider reconsider that classification.

“I think the fact that the feds made that move, that makes it more likely,” Braun said.

“You’re going to need to ask the legislators and the leaders in those two chambers to see what they’re thinking, because I’m clear in terms of where I’m at,” he continued. “You’ve got to take what’s evolved over time. (If you) stick your head in the sand, you’re generally going to make the wrong decision.”

As a gubernatorial candidate in 2024, Braun said he was possibly willing to consider allowing medical-use sales, but not recreational, Fox59 reported.

The governor’s comments on Tuesday came shortly before the release of a study on the current status of marijuana and other intoxicating cannabinoids in Indiana, and another study on considerations for marijuana regulations if the state decided to ease up on the drug.

The pair of reports were conducted by RAND on behalf of the Richard Fairbanks Foundation, which seeks to advance health, education and more in the city of Indianapolis.

Emi Whitesell, the vice president of impact and evaluation, said Fairbanks commissioned the research in 2024 to fill a gap in reliable data centered on Indiana.

“We don’t have a position,” Whitesell said of marijuana legalization. “This is purely informative. We know there have been so many conversations … about potentially changing our marijuana policies. … It’s so complex and it’s sometimes hard to get really good data and really good information about it.”

Much of the research on legalization focuses on states that already have already authorized the drug for medicinal use, unlike Indiana, the foundation found.

The Hoosier State is one of 10 states that haven’t legalized medical marijuana, let alone recreational.

Despite that, residents can access intoxicating cannabinoids and marijuana itelf relatively easily, according to Fairbanks.

That’s because Indiana hasn’t banned or regulated the sale of products with delta-8 THC, THCA or other intoxicating cannabinoids. State legislative efforts have failed repeatedly. Now, such products are “ubiquitous,” researchers wrote. A federal ban will go into effect in November, although several bills have been filed to delay that.

Additionally, researchers found that 44% of Hoosiers, or nearly 3 million people, live within a 50-mile drive of at least one licensed dispensary in another state. A whopping 96%, or 5.6 million people, live within a 100-mile drive.

“In practical terms, almost all Hoosiers who wish to purchase cannabis from a retail store can do so with a round-trip drive of fewer than four hours,” they wrote.

Researchers estimated that residents spend about $1.8 billion on marijuana annually, and that Indiana’s criminal justice system spends $10 million-$20 million on enforcement annually.

They also explored a range of policy routes Indiana could pursue.

The first, in which the state maintains its prohibition, involves no change.

The state could also reduce criminal penalties for marijuana possession by directing law enforcement to treat it as low priority, reduce fines or jail time, or eliminate criminal penalties for small amounts in favor of civil citations. The state could make it easier to expunge or seal past convictions for possession, or even automatically perform those actions for convictions after a set period.

Indiana could also join the 24 states that have legalized marijuana for recreational use. Researchers laid out 14 major policy decisions leaders would have to make, including: who could grow, refine and sell marijuana; at what level to tax marijuana and more.

All of those policy levels would figure into a medical marijuana system, according to Fairbanks, along with four more considerations: what conditions qualify for use, what medical professionals could recommend someone obtain a license, the cost of a license and who could procure the marijuana for patients who can’t travel to buy it or grow it at home themselves.

The state and local governments would still spend money on enforcement even if marijuana is legalized in some form, researchers noted. Driving under the influence and possessing the drug underage would likely remain banned, for instance. New costs could include licensing, inspections, testing and more.

But legalization could bring in $180 million in tax revenue annually by the fifth year, researchers estimated — or 1% of the state’s $18 billion General Fund. Revenue depends on a variety of factors, however, and could range from $100 million at the low end to $270 million at the high end.

Reporter Mackenzi Klemann contributed.

[caption id="attachment_130578" align="aligncenter" width="749"] The map, courtesy of the Richard M. Fairbanks Foundation, shows the large number of dispensaries located just outside of the Indiana state line.[/caption]

* * *

The Indiana Capital Chronicle is an independent, nonprofit news organization dedicated to giving Hoosiers a comprehensive look inside state government, policy and elections. The site combines daily coverage with in-depth scrutiny, political awareness and insightful commentary.

You can read the original version of the story here.

The post Braun signals openness to marijuana legalization as outside report outlines policy considerations appeared first on News Now Warsaw.

About 14,000 additional low-income children could soon nab vouchers for free and reduced-cost child care under a $200 million proposal announced Tuesday by Gov. Mike Braun’s administration.

The administration will ask the State Budget Committee to let it divert $200 million from the General Fund to another account — created to cover underfunding in other agencies — and use the money to reopen admissions for a key child care program.

The Child Care and Development Fund is a state-administered federal program that serves about 43,000 children in Indiana. Families must meet income and work requirements to qualify for the assistance.

“Every voucher represents a working parent that wants to take a step forward for both their lives and then also for the next generation of Hoosier lives here,” said Adam Alson, the director of Early Childhood and Out-of-School Learning, which administers CCDF in Indiana.

“This is not just a social service program,” Alson added. “This is an economic engine that supports Indiana’s workforce and the state’s long-term economic future.”

The program has been closed to new children for more than a year, since enrollment peaked at 69,000 in December 2024. Former Gov. Eric Holcomb’s administration paused sign-ups and opened a waitlist.

Braun’s administration previously said the program would not expand until 2027, citing funding constraints after a dismal revenue forecast. But the latest forecast is significantly rosier.

Shortly after, lawmakers approved Senate Enrolled Act 4, allowing the state to spend money from the $300 million Financial Responsibility and Opportunity Growth fund on CCDF — or to direct more money to the fund specifically for CCDF.

The $200 million move would be subject to State Budget Committee approval. The lawmaker-dominated body next meets Thursday, for the first time since the end of the legislative session.

According to the March revenue report, Indiana is now $653 million ahead of the budget plan.

“We as an administration understand the importance of the CCDF voucher program, and we want to bring this to the State Budget Committee as quickly as possible … in order for child care businesses, families and children … (to) have more clarity around what the future holds,” Alson told the Capital Chronicle.

His office is part of the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration. As of February, almost 35,400 children were waiting for a CCDF voucher, according to FSSA’s child care subsidy dashboard.

The $200 million is projected to bring enrollment back up to 57,000, bringing a lucky 14,000 off the waitlist as soon as May.

Alson said there will be seats set aside for foster and kinship families, followed by slots for special needs and homeless children, as well as for the children of child care workers.

Indiana Public Media has reported that the voucher pause is forcing foster parents to pass on children they otherwise would’ve taken in.

“We don’t want the hindrance on that, for those individuals and those families that are looking to do that, to be the cost of child care,” Alson said.

The number of seats set aside per category hasn’t yet been determined, according to Alson. If the augmentation is approved at the Thursday meeting, implementation would begin late May.

That timeline is intended to give child care providers time to reopen classrooms and rehire staff. Many providers have constricted their operations or even closed amid the voucher enrollment crunch and deep cuts in voucher reimbursement rates from the state.

Regulated provider capacity has grown from about 170,900 in December 2024 to 175,600 in December 2025, according to FSSA quarterly financial reporting. But the state has lost 64 locations over that year.

Asked how to offer child care providers greater stability, Alson acknowledged the importance of “consistent funding,” as well as reduced regulatory burdens.

The $200 million influx will be paired with a statewide variance waiving state regulations on the mixing of different age groups at the beginning and end of the day, which Alson said increases staffing costs.

About 21,400 children are expected to remain on the waitlist, however.

“This $200 million is the largest one-time investment, one-year investment, in child care in the state’s history,” Alson said. “And it’s a significant step forward in … our acknowledgement of the importance of the child care space to the state of Indiana.”

“I think after we execute this, we’ll have a much better handle on what that demand for this program is as well — and we’ll be in a … more advantageous position going into the next budget cycle to address things like this,” he continued.

* * *

The Indiana Capital Chronicle is an independent, nonprofit news organization dedicated to giving Hoosiers a comprehensive look inside state government, policy and elections. The site combines daily coverage with in-depth scrutiny, political awareness and insightful commentary.

You can read the original version of the story here.

The post Governor to pump $200M into child care vouchers, take 14K kids off waitlist appeared first on News Now Warsaw.

By Niki Kelly and Mackenezi Klemann
Indiana Capital Chronicle

Gov. Mike Braun issued an executive order Wednesday to enact a 30-day suspension of the 7% sales tax on gasoline — with the potential for extensions.

“I am declaring a gas tax holiday to give Hoosiers relief from the pain at the pump from high gas prices,” Braun said in a news release. “Affordability is my top priority.”

The order is in effect now through May 8. Braun called on retailers to pass savings directly to customers, noting the state will be monitoring prices to make sure.

Taxes on fuel in Indiana are made up of the federal gas tax of 18.4 cents per gallon, the state excise tax of 36 cents per gallon and the 7% state sales tax.

The current average cost for a gallon of gas in Indiana, according to AAA, is $4.14 — of which about 17 cents is attributable to the sales tax.

Braun estimated savings for Hoosiers could reach $50 million a month. He will revisit the emergency declaration in 30 days.

Attorney General Todd Rokita also announced that his office will actively monitor fuel prices across the state and enforce price gouging protections.

“Hoosiers deserve the full relief intended by this emergency measure and we will use every tool at our disposal to ensure that the removal of the tax translates into lower prices at the pump — and that consumers are not taken advantage of during this time,” Rokita said in a news release. “If a consumer suspects that a gas station in Indiana is still charging tax during the suspension, they should file a consumer complaint with our office.”

History of suspending gasoline sales tax

In 2000, then-Gov. Frank O’Bannon suspended the sales tax on gasoline for two 60-day periods heading into an election. It saved motorists more than $46 million.

At that time, gas was nearing $2 a gallon; the savings were between 8 and 10 cents per gallon.

O’Bannon cited a 1981 statute allowing him to declare an energy emergency if “an existing or projected shortfall of at least eight percent (8%) of motor fuel or of other energy sources that threatens to seriously disrupt or diminish energy supplies to the extent that life, health, or property may be jeopardized.”

The law doesn’t specifically mention fuel taxes, but it allows the governor to “suspend the provisions of any state statute regulating transportation or the orders or rules of any state agency if strict compliance with any of the provisions would prevent, hinder, or delay necessary action in coping with the energy emergency.”

Authority unclear

But in 2007, then-Gov. Mitch Daniels asked the Attorney General’s Office whether he had the authority to suspend the sales tax on gas.

The letter, signed by then Chief Deputy Attorney General Gregory Zoeller, said it was “clear that a suspension of a sales tax is not among those powers enumerated by this statute nor does it fall with the same category of those within the 1981 act.”

“Without further legislative action granting the governor the authority to suspend the gas tax, we agree that this authority is not within the intent of the 1981 statute,” the letter continued.

A message to Rokita’s office seeking clarity on authority wasn’t immediately returned. All AG opinions are non-binding.

“We feel this is within the latitude of what I’m able to do,” Braun told reporters Wednesday, citing the cumulative effect of inflation.

“The emergency was created by conditions outside our control,” he said, “and that was done in D.C. — not particularly on fuel, but in many of those years it was way above $4. We’ve been carrying that burden for a long time.”

The executive order said the ongoing war with Iran “has threatened the global supply of oil,” with 20% to 25% of the world’s crude oil production shipped through the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian officials have blocked the strait in recent weeks.

When asked about the 8% shortage requirement, the governor’s office cited the executive order.

Braun praised President Donald Trump for negotiating a two-week ceasefire with Iran, which he said should lead to lower fuel prices over time.

“This is big news,” Braun said. “You can already see it in the markets. We’ll begin to see that peace dividend over time, and there’s now clarity in terms of what they’re doing.”

Legislative reaction

Half a dozen Senate Republicans released statements supporting the move, including the chamber’s leader.

“Senate Republicans have led on issues of affordability for years, resulting in one of the lowest costs of living in the country for Hoosiers, but the recent spike in gas prices is still leaving many Hoosiers feeling undue pressure on their budgets,” said Senate President Pro Tempore Rodric Bray, R-Martinsville. “With affordability top of mind right now, I’m supportive of temporarily suspending the state’s sales tax on gas.”

Many of those in support are facing primary challenges and have been attacked for earlier votes to raise the gas tax.

Markle Republican Sen. Travis Holdman, who is locked in a tough reelection race, called on Braun to suspend the gas tax moments before he did so.

“Despite everything we have done at the Statehouse to maintain our state’s low cost of living, the current price of gas is adding too much pressure on Hoosiers and their wallets,” Holdman said. “Today, along with some of my colleagues, I am calling on Gov. Braun to provide relief at the pump for Hoosiers by using his legal authority to suspend the state’s tax on gas.”

House Democrats backed the suspension on Wednesday but questioned the timing.

House Minority Leader Phil GiaQuinta, D-Fort Wayne, noted the caucus repeatedly called for a suspension back in 2022, when gas prices jumped amid Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

“I want to be clear: House Democrats support this suspension, but Gov. Braun and Statehouse Republicans are only cleaning up a mess that they helped create,” GiaQuinta said in a Wednesday news release. “Hoosiers are tired of unstrategic and unfocused foreign wars that cost American lives, drive up gas prices and raise the cost of living.”

The post Braun announces 30-day break on Indiana sales tax for gasoline appeared first on News Now Warsaw.

Mike Braun revealed a new economic development initiative Tuesday aimed at creating 100,000 high-wage agriculture and life sciences jobs over the next decade.

The post Braun unveils $1 billion agriculture and life sciences initiative appeared first on News Now Warsaw.