Marijuana, and the tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) levels that make someone feel high, is legal for recreational purposes in three of Indiana’s four neighboring states. But figuring out when someone is too high to drive has proven to be a difficult task.

“THC is probably one of the trickiest things I’ve ever tried to nail down,” shared Rep. Wendy McNamara, R-Evansville. “And two things I’m trying to do with this bill … (is) give the state of Indiana an opportunity to figure out who are impaired drivers (and) being able to do that through the qualified test that people are already using on the streets today.”

Unlike alcohol, which has decades of research indicating that 0.08 blood alcohol concentration causes impairment, THC use doesn’t have an established and roundly accepted threshold. Under current law, a Hoosier with any THC in their system could be charged for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated without any other evidence — or a “per se” statute.

“We need a threshold of some kind,” said Michael Moore, testifying on behalf of the Public Defender’s Council. “We would prefer it to be intoxication or evidence of intoxication, but if they’re going to keep the per se statute, some threshold — like five nanograms … would have been a move in the right direction.”

House Bill 1119, by McNamara,  originally would have established a threshold of five nanograms of THC in someone’s saliva as a threshold for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated for legal purposes. But an amendment introduced by McNamara on Wednesday would allow new test results to be admissible as evidence in court — something Moore and others didn’t support.

Four House court committee members raised concerns about the new language, but ultimately only Rep. Joanna King, R-Middlebury, voted against the measure.

“I’m concerned about false positives,” King said. “… I just think this needs a longer, deeper look.”

Wanted: A test for THC impairment

Illinois, Michigan and Ohio each have legalized recreational access to marijuana while Kentucky has legalized the drug for medicinal use. Lawmakers have repeatedly opposed any efforts to regulate marijuana for either purpose.

But thousands of Hoosier cross those state borders regularly, perhaps purchasing THC in a smokeable or edible form, and potentially legally use the drug before passing back over Indiana’s borders.

They could be charged even if they aren’t impaired since the state doesn’t have a defined threshold.

McNamara told committee members she’d worked with a researcher for two years to craft the bill, which specifies that measuring THC levels in “oral fluids” must be with the Drager DrugTest 500 or SoToxa Oral Fluid Mobile Test System.

“Oral fluids” primarily refers to saliva.

The latter tests are currently available to law enforcement officers through grants from the Indiana Criminal Justice Institute and screen for other drugs like amphetamines, cocaine, opiates and benzodiazepines, according to McNamara.

She continued to say that SoToxa’s cutoff for a “positive” test was 25 milligrams of THC, while Drager had a lower threshold at 5 milligrams.

In response to committee questions, McNamara said she opted to include specific brands because of their reliability, rather than a generic term.

“If you’re going to do this, you want to make sure — from county to county — that you at least have some consistency …. Consistency is the key right now, since it’s so new,” McNamara said.

Taking the tests to court

Chris Daniels, a traffic safety resource prosecutor with the Indiana prosecuting attorneys council, said that every state wrestled with the best way to measure driver drug impairment across various drug types.

“Drug driving is an increasing problem; it’s costing more and more lives across the country and in the state,” Daniels said.

The amended bill explicitly says that law enforcement may not arrest someone “solely” because of their test result. Instead, the results are meant to be used as evidence to help a jury make a decision, McNamara said.

Daniels called it an “emerging science” and said prosecutors wouldn’t be able to “rely solely” on test results from either SoToxa or Drager. Other evidence could include a blood test, weaving on the road or failing a sobriety test.

“We would still have to prove that somebody was intoxicated under that statute — or we would still have to prove that the substance was in somebody’s blood — but having that oral fluid result come in would help bolster those results,” Daniels said.

For Moore, that wasn’t enough of a protection.

“Even though they can’t make an arrest for a positive result on these two tests, they can still charge someone. That, of course, can be brought to court (and they’d) have to answer and suffer a punishment,” Moore said. “These test results will come in without any real evidence to refute it.”

Additionally, the bill allows for state lab technicians to remotely testify in court in certain conditions, lessening the burden on the overtaxed agency. Daniels said technicians had already spent 75 hours traveling and five hours testifying in 2025.

* * *

The Indiana Capital Chronicle is an independent, nonprofit news organization dedicated to giving Hoosiers a comprehensive look inside state government, policy and elections. The site combines daily coverage with in-depth scrutiny, political awareness and insightful commentary.

You can read the original version of the story here.

The post Lawmakers move to establish THC test threshold for impaired driving appeared first on News Now Warsaw.

INDIANAPOLIS -- For the first time ever, lawmakers heard testimony during a legislative session both for and against legalizing pot.

A hearing of the Indiana House Courts and Criminal Code committee is the first committee to consider a bill to legalize pot in some capacity in Indiana. However, that is as far as the matter will go this session as State Rep. Wendy McNamara, who chairs the committee, said that she would not be bringing the bill back up for a vote this session.

Before that decision was made, the committee heard testimony from many different people and organizations with a stake in the subject legal pot.

"It's time that Indiana joins all of its neighboring states,"said State Rep Heath VanNatter (R-Kokomo) who authored the bill. "Every state around us has some form of legalization — Ohio and Kentucky have medical and Illinois and Michigan have recreational."

His bill would remove criminal penalties for people who are caught with 2 ounces of pot or less.

Dr. Richard Feldman, Indiana's former state health commissioner, even spoke in favor of the bill.

"Marijuana is not a hard drug," Dr. Feldman said. "It’s not a narcotic and certainly safer than alcohol and tobacco."

There were those in opposition to the bill who spoke. Barbara Rosenberg, who is legal counsel for Indiana State Police, said there are many concerns about it from the law enforcement community.

"There’s still concerns about anyone having access to this if you can grow this product in your backyard or have that ability," she said. "And with that comes the concern that there will be enhanced use prior to driving on our roads."

Others, like the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, are concerned that the bill makes things confusing regarding how to approach drug testing of workers by employers.

In the end, VanNatter said he got some good feedback on the bill and plans to re-introduce it in next year's legislative session with some tweaks.

The post Cannabis bill gets hearing, but will not advance appeared first on News Now Warsaw.